Quantocracy

Quant Blog Mashup

ST
  • Quant Mashup
  • About
    • About Quantocracy
    • FAQs
    • Contact Us
  • ST

Quantocracy’s Daily Wrap for 09/28/2015

This is a summary of links featured on Quantocracy on Monday, 09/28/2015. To see our most recent links, visit the Quant Mashup. Read on readers!

  • Using the VIX Futures Term Structure to Reduce Equity Exposure [EconomPic]

    The WSJ blog had a recent article The VIX Market Suggests Its Not Yet Time to Buy the Dips outlining: Typically, longer-dated VIX futures are more expensive than VIX futures expiring in the current month, as theres a greater chance of stock swings over a longer time period. That makes for a an upward sloping futures curve. In times of stress, when investors are very fearful about the stock
  • Forget “Active vs. Passive”: It s All About Factors [GestaltU]

    We just love a good debate, and there seems to be quite a heated debate at the moment about the relative utility of passive versus active investing. Perhaps this debate is as timeless as investment management itself, but a flurry of recent studies may have finally armed passive advocates with enough ammunition to settle the argument once and for all. The Passive Posse First, some background on
  • Value and Momentum in Sports Betting [Alpha Architect]

    As noted through our previous posts, we are big proponents of Value investing and Momentum investing strategies. We even highlight the best way to combine value and momentum. However, there is a new paper by Toby Moskowitz titled Asset Pricing and Sports Betting which examines how size, value and momentum affect sports betting contracts: I use sports betting markets as a laboratory to test
  • [Academic Paper] Extreme Events in Stock Market Fundamental Factors [@Quantivity]

    Extreme Events in Stock Market Fundamental Factors
  • [Academic Paper] Understanding Systematic Risk: A High-Frequency Approach [@Quantivity]

    Understanding Systematic Risk: A High-Frequency Approach
  • Is trend following market timing? [Flirting with Models]

    Summary We often hear trend following being referred to as market timing In all active strategies, timing is an important concept Market timing is a distinct process whereby investors try to predict the future Momentum is reactionary, not predictive, and is therefore no more a form of market timing than value investing is Trend following investment strategies seek to invest in positive
  • Market Prudence Reason For The Trade [Algo Trading 101]

    Approach to Designing Amazing Strategies Add a SMA(30)! No add an EMA(18). Optimise it to find the best parameter value. Ok well stick to EMA(15). Throw in 3 date and time filters, 3 optimised price indicators and 3 volume indicators (that are essentially saying the same thing in different ways) and we will have the ultimate trading strategy! The above scenario describes a disaster
  • Runge-Kutta Example and Code [Dekalog Blog]

    Following on from my last post I thought I would, as a first step, code up a "straightforward" Runge-Kutta function and show how to deal with the fact that there is no "magic mathematical formula" to calculate the slopes that are an integral part of Runge-Kutta. My approach is to fit a quadratic function to the last n_bars of price and take the slope of this via my
  • [Academic Paper] Momentum and Risk Adjustment [@Quantivity]

    Momentum and Risk Adjustment
  • [Academic Paper] Market Condition and Momentum [@Quantivity]

    Market Condition and Momentum
  • [Academic Paper] Measuring Multiscaling in Financial Time Series [@Quantivity]

    Measuring Multiscaling in Financial Time Series

Filed Under: Daily Wraps

Best Links of the Week

The best quant mashup links for the week ending Saturday, 09/26 as voted by our readers:

  • Hypothesis-Driven Development Part V: Stop-Loss, Deflating Sharpes, and Out-of-Sample [QuantStrat TradeR]
  • Combining diversified alpha to deliver superior Sharpe [Quants Portal]

Three of the top rated links this week resulted from a bit of a kerfuffle between two bloggers frequently featured on the mashup.

Keep calm and get your nerd on.

Keep calm and get your nerd on.

While I think skepticism and debate are essential, and something we quantitative types are inherently suited for, generally speaking, I take a dim view of personal conflict within our community of quant bloggers.

The investment world at large is rife with name-calling and chest-pounding, the jocks and the popular kids in the lunch room so to speak. We are, by our very nature, the nerds at the “smart kids” table. There aren’t a lot of us, and while we should demand a lot from one another, when all is said and done, we should also stick together.

Having said all of that, I think that there was value in both bloggers’ underlying points of view, and opted to carry the kerfuffle on the mashup.

* * *

My fellow quant traders, ask not what Quantocracy can do for you, ask what you can do for Quantocracy. Vote for your favorite links on our quant mashup to encourage bloggers to write quality content. We do our part by providing this site without annoying advertising. All we ask is that you take a moment to participate in the process.

If you haven’t done so already, register to vote. Once registered, you can choose to remain logged in indefinitely, making voting as simple and painless as possible.

Read on Readers!
Mike @ Quantocracy

Filed Under: Best Of

Quantocracy’s Daily Wrap for 09/26/2015

This is a summary of links featured on Quantocracy on Saturday, 09/26/2015. To see our most recent links, visit the Quant Mashup. Read on readers!

  • Empirical Finance: Meeting Fiduciary Standards Through Skepticism, Not Cynicism [GestaltU]

    Michael Edesses is out with a scathing article lambasting the field of empirical finance. He draws inspiration from Harvey, Liu and Zhus (HLZ) recent article, entitled and the Cross Section of Expected Returns, but extends HLZs conclusions to an absurd limit. In this article, we discuss why we embrace the framework of healthy skepticism described by HLZ, but in the context of a more

Filed Under: Daily Wraps

Quantocracy’s Daily Wrap for 09/25/2015

This is a summary of links featured on Quantocracy on Friday, 09/25/2015. To see our most recent links, visit the Quant Mashup. Read on readers!

  • A story of poor statistical intuition [Investment Idiocy]

    In my last post I had a bit of a controversial pop at a brilliant and successful billionaire hedge fund manager; Jim Simons. In continuing my futile quest to raise the level of debate in the quantitative investment community I thought I'd have a go at another clever and very wealthy guy, Cliff Asness, founder of giant fund AQR. Cliff Asness. There is nothing wrong with his statistical
  • The S&P 500 Death Cross Time to Panic? [iMarketSignals]

    At the end of August 2015 the 50-day moving average of the S&P500 crossed its 200-day moving average to the downside the 33rd occurrence of a Death Cross since 1950. The performance of the S&P500 was investigated for periods ranging from one year before to two years after a Death Cross. During the last 65 years there were ten recessions. A Death Cross preceded six recessions and
  • Runge-Kutta Methods [Dekalog Blog]

    As stated in my previous post I have been focusing on getting some meaningful features as possible inputs to my machine learning based trading system, and one of the possible ideas that has caught my attention is using Runge-Kutta methods to project ( otherwise known as "guessing" ) future price evolution. I have used this sort of approach before in the construction of my perfect
  • Correlation and Cointegration [Quant Dare]

    I want a strategy that is able to choose the assets that makes it look like an index Yt. -Then take the ones most correlated to it. -Ok, but look: CC1 The Xt and the Xt+c series have exactly the same correlation with Yt -I prefer Xt+c!! -Yes, but I am trying to be very similar to Yt and Xt+c have a large deviation. -Cointegration? -If two or more series are individually integrated (in the time

Filed Under: Daily Wraps

Quantocracy’s Daily Wrap for 09/23/2015

This is a summary of links featured on Quantocracy on Wednesday, 09/23/2015. To see our most recent links, visit the Quant Mashup. Read on readers!

  • Sorry Jim, trend following probably still works (though not the fast stuff) [Investment Idiocy]

    Sorry Jim, trend following probably still works (though not the fast stuff) Sometimes really smart people still get things wrong. Even really smart people, who have been very successful, and are thus very rich. Jim Simons. Very Rich. Very Smart (www.pbs.org) During a recent TED talk Jim Simons said: Trend-following would have been great in the 60s, and it was sort of OK in the 70s. By the
  • ‘Javascript for Financial Analysts’ Chapter 3 – First Draft [John Orford]

    The first chapter ended with code which included a map and a filter which we will dive back into now with a less applied more intuitive example. Open up the JavaScript console and paste or type in the following code, [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] .filter( function(j){ return j%2===1; } ); This code filters the array of numbers and returns an array of odd numbers. > [1,3,5,7,9] One feature of filter and
  • Out-of-sample testing of Sell in May market timing rule [Quantitative Investor]

    In one of the previous posts I considered market timing with moving averages on 9 quite different equity indices that were chosen in other post, and came to the conclusion that the rule is the viable alternative to the standard B&H, allowing to avoid large drawdowns in one cases and even improve performance in others (e.g. it is bad idea to passively invest in Nikkei index, but even with
  • Momentum trends with Andreas @Clenow [Automated Trader]

    Andreas Clenow is CIO of Zurich-based ACIES Asset Management ($300+ million AuM), and author of 'Stocks on the Move: Beating the Market with Hedge Fund Momentum Strategies'. Why would he give up the super secret sauce in a tell-all? Automated Trader finds out. CTAsHedge Funds Andreas Clenow, CIO, ACIES Asset Management Andreas Clenow, CIO, ACIES Asset Management "People think that
  • Using a Random Forest and Hidden Markov Model to Improve Trade Performance [Inovance]

    Machine learning is a powerful tool for not only coming up with new strategies (like we do in TRAIDE) but also for improving your existing strategies. In this article, well cover adjusting your position size using a random forest algorithm and turning your strategy on an off using a Hidden Markov Model. You can copy and paste the R code to try it yourself on your own strategies. This article

Filed Under: Daily Wraps

Quantocracy’s Daily Wrap for 09/21/2015

This is a summary of links featured on Quantocracy on Monday, 09/21/2015. To see our most recent links, visit the Quant Mashup. Read on readers!

  • The Active Share Debate: AQR versus the Academics [Alpha Architect]

    There is an interesting discussion in the geeky world of academic finance literature between the intellectual muscle at AQR and academia. aqr versus the academics on active share The discussion revolves around the following question: Does Active Share matter? This is an important topic for active ETFs and Mutual Funds in the marketplace. The original paper on this measure was written by
  • Risk Management for Automated Trading I : Lack of it [Quant Insti]

    Impact of Proliferation of Automated Trading Systems and Technology on Financial Markets With the advent of automated trading everything has become computerized. Risk management takes a whole new level in this technologically fast paced world. The trends in day-to-day trading have been changing. This change has led to many automated trading failures where risk was not managed in a sound manner.
  • Correlation and correlation structure [Eran Raviv]

    This post is about copulas and heavy tails. In a previous post we discussed the concept of correlation structure. The aim is to characterize the correlation across the distribution. Prior to the global financial crisis many investors were under the impression that they were diversified, and they were, for how things looked there and then. Alas, when things went south, correlation in the new
  • Forecasting interest rates [Econbrowser]

    There was lots of action in financial markets last week, with much of the attention focused on the U.S. Federal Reserve. The interest rate on a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond edged up 10 basis points early in the week in anticipation that the Fed might finally raise its target for the short-term interest rate. But it shed all that and more after the Fed announced it was standing pat for now. Price of

Filed Under: Daily Wraps

Quantocracy’s Daily Wrap for 09/20/2015

This is a summary of links featured on Quantocracy on Sunday, 09/20/2015. To see our most recent links, visit the Quant Mashup. Read on readers!

  • Best Links of the Week [Quantocracy]

    The best quant mashup links for the week ending Saturday, 09/19 as voted by our readers: Hacking the Random Walk Hypothesis [Turing Finance] Getting Started: Building a Fully Automated Trading System [Quants Portal] Interview with Euan Sinclair [EP Chan] Interview with Dr Ernest Chan [Factor Wave] Probability Investing [Price Acti
  • Getting Started with Javascript – First Draft [John Orford]

    First draft of 'Javascript for Financial Analysts' Chapter 1. ~ Much of our coding time is spent in an interactive environment, colloquially called the 'REPL', 'Read-Eval-Print Loop' or console. The REPL reads input, evaluates it according to our code and prints it. Javascript's REPLs, can be found in any browser, by pressing Ctrl+Shif
  • When is a Backtest Too Good to be True? Part Two [Quintuitive]

    In the previous post, I went through a simple exercise which, to me, clearly demonsrtates that 60% out of sample guess rate (on daily basis) for S&P 500 will generate ridiculous returns. From the feedback I got, it seemed that my example was somewhat unconvincing. Lets dig a bit further then. Lets add Sharpe ratio and maximum drawdown to the CAGR and compute all three for
  • Will Yesterday s Shooting Star Make Bears Wishes Come True? [Dana Lyons]

    Like its bullish counterpart, the hammer, this bearish reversal pattern has been inconsistent in its forecasting abilities, except under certain conditions. Weve covered the hammer candlestick chart pattern on a couple occasions over the past few years, most extensively in this October 2014 post. The pattern, which involves a significant selloff from the open followed b
  • SPX Straddle – 38 DTE – Manage Profits at 25% [DTR Trading]

    In this post we look at the backtest results of selling a one-lot, at-the-money (ATM) straddle on the S&P 500 Index (SPX), initiated at 38 days-to-expiration (DTE). In this third post of five on 38 DTE straddles, we look at trades that use the same loss exits as shown in the first post, and in addition, take profits at 25% of the credit received. The results displayed in this post rep

Filed Under: Daily Wraps

Best Links of the Week

The best quant mashup links for the week ending Saturday, 09/19 as voted by our readers:

  • Hacking the Random Walk Hypothesis [Turing Finance]
  • Getting Started: Building a Fully Automated Trading System [Quants Portal]
  • Interview with Euan Sinclair [EP Chan]
  • Interview with Dr Ernest Chan [Factor Wave]
  • Hypothesis Driven Development Part IV: Testing The Barroso/Santa Clara Rule [QuantStrat TradeR]

We also welcome two new blogs making their first ever appearance on the mashup this week:

  • Out-of-sample test of market timing with moving averages [Quantitative Investor]
  • Statistics Behind Pair Trading (I): Correlation and Cointegration [Quant Insti]

* * *

My fellow quant traders, ask not what Quantocracy can do for you, ask what you can do for Quantocracy. Vote for your favorite links on our quant mashup to encourage bloggers to write quality content. We do our part by providing this site without annoying advertising. All we ask is that you take a moment to participate in the process.

If you haven’t done so already, register to vote. Once registered, you can choose to remain logged in indefinitely, making voting as simple and painless as possible.

Read on Readers!
Mike @ Quantocracy

Filed Under: Best Of

Quantocracy’s Daily Wrap for 09/19/2015

This is a summary of links featured on Quantocracy on Saturday, 09/19/2015. To see our most recent links, visit the Quant Mashup. Read on readers!

    No new links posted.

Filed Under: Daily Wraps

Quantocracy’s Daily Wrap for 09/18/2015

This is a summary of links featured on Quantocracy on Friday, 09/18/2015. To see our most recent links, visit the Quant Mashup. Read on readers!

  • Interview with Euan Sinclair [EP Chan]

    I have been a big fan of options trader and author Euan Sinclair for a long time. I have cited his highly readable and influential book Option Trading in my own work, and it is always within easy reach from my desk. His more recent book Volatility Trading is another must-read. I ran into him at the Chicago Trading Show a few months ago where he was a panelist on volatility trading, and
  • Can Investors Achieve Commodity Exposure via Equities? [Alpha Architect]

    This past year we examined the possibility of replicating commodity exposure via equities. The project was spurred by an insightful research report from MSCI, which showed some impressive results. Other research outfits have proposed similar concepts. The figure below, taken from the MSCI report, highlights how well the MSCI Select Commodity Producers Index replicates various commodity
  • An Update on Jay s Pure Momentum Sector Fund System [Jay On The Markets]

    Todays article is an update on this oldie but goodie. When people ask me if momentum investing works, at this point because I am older and (even) crankier than I used to be I typically refer them to the linked article above and grunt decide for yourself. Sorry, its just my nature. (See also: The Signpost Up Ahead: The September Danger Zone)
  • SPX Straddle – 38 DTE – Manage Profits at 10% [DTR Trading]

    In this post we look at the backtest results of selling a one-lot, at-the-money (ATM) straddle on the S&P 500 Index (SPX), initiated at 38 days-to-expiration (DTE). In this second post of five on 38 DTE straddles, we look at trades that use the same loss exits as shown in the first post, and in addition, take profits at 10% of the credit received. The results displayed in this post re

Filed Under: Daily Wraps

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 206
  • 207
  • 208
  • 209
  • 210
  • …
  • 219
  • Next Page »

Welcome to Quantocracy

This is a curated mashup of quantitative trading links. Keep up with all this quant goodness via RSS, Facebook, StockTwits, Mastodon, Threads and Bluesky.

Copyright © 2015-2025 · Site Design by: The Dynamic Duo