This is a summary of links featured on Quantocracy on Monday, 06/03/2019. To see our most recent links, visit the Quant Mashup. Read on readers!
-
Tactical Asset Allocation in May [Allocate Smartly]This is a summary of the recent performance of a wide range of excellent Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) strategies, net of transaction costs. These strategies are sourced from books, academic papers, and other publications. While we dont (yet) include every published TAA model, these strategies are broadly representative of the TAA space. Learn more about what we do or let AllocateSmartly help
-
Tactical Credit [Flirting with Models]In this commentary we explore tactical credit strategies that switch between high yield bonds and core fixed income exposures. We find that short-term momentum signals generate statistically significant annualized excess returns. We use a cross-section of statistically significant strategy parameterizations to generate an ensemble strategy.Consistent with past research, we find that this ensemble
-
Quantamental Investing – A Century of Inventions [Two Centuries Investments]Last weeks talk by Edward Altman at the 50-year anniversary of Altmans Z-score event at the CFA New York inspired me to compile an expanded list of memorable inventions in equity analysis. Each one is a successful blend of quantitative and fundamental thinking – which is increasingly being called quantamental investing, for example see here and here. I am inspired by this list,
-
How to Allocate Smartly to Smart Beta [Factor Research]This research note was originally published in the Beyond Beta magazine from ETF Stream. Here is the link. SUMMARY Single factor excess returns are attractive over the long-term, less in the short-term Comparing popular asset allocation models does not highlight one superior methodology Multi-factor portfolios generated excess returns in two out of three regions since 2008 INTRODUCTION Obesity
-
Is factor momentum really everywhere? [Alpha Architect]The research presented here covers the largest number of factors (65) tested in the academic literature. The most robust and well-cited factors appear in the list of data items, available since the 1960s. A notable exclusion is the IBES dataset, which is available only in the 1980s. Is there persistence in factor returns? If so, can timing models based on autoregressive patterns work successfully